Earthquake was felt from Space

For the first time, a natural source of infrasonic waves of Earth has been measured directly from space–450 kilometers above the planet’s surface. The source was the massive 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake in Japan, and its signature was detected at this orbital altitude only eight minutes after the arrival of seismic and infrasonic waves, according to Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Caltech’s Yu-Ming (Oscar) Yang and colleagues in collaboration with the University of New Brunswick, Canada, who present their research today at the annual meeting of the Seismological Society of America (SSA).

GRACE satellite

GRACE satellite

Infrasonic waves, with frequencies much lower than an audible voice, can be generated by sources as diverse as volcanoes, earthquakes, rocket launches and meteor air blasts. Their signature can be detected in the upper atmosphere as either fluctuations in air pressure or as electron density disruptions. In the case of the 2011 quake, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites orbiting Earth captured the significant ionospheric signature produced by the quake’s infrasonic wave output. The GRACE measurements were similar to those captured by ground-based GPS and seismic stations, the researchers note.

The findings suggest that these satellite-based measurements could be useful in future early warning systems of natural hazards. The analysis also lends more support to the idea that such detection systems could be useful in measuring seismic activity from space, as would be the case for infrasonic detection missions like those envisioned for the atmosphere of Venus.

 Seismological Society of America. “The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake was felt from space.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 23 April 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150423125840.htm>.

Clues to Earth’s ancient core

Old rocks hold on to their secrets. Now, a geophysicist at Michigan Technological University has unlocked clues trapped in the magnetic signatures of mineral grains in those rocks. These clues will help clear up the murky history of Earth’s early core.

The journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters published a paper on the subject earlier this year. Aleksey Smirnov, an associate professor of geophysics and adjunct associate professor of physics at Michigan Tech, led the study.

Aleksey Smirnov drills into an outcrop in Australia's Widgiemooltha dike swarm. Credit: Image courtesy of Michigan Technological University

Aleksey Smirnov drills into an outcrop in Australia’s Widgiemooltha dike swarm.
Credit: Image courtesy of Michigan Technological University

The work took him Down Under, where he drilled into rock outcrops in Australia’s Widgiemooltha dike swarm that are more than two billion years old. Studying rocks this old–and extracting data from them–is tricky but helps unravel the core’s mysteries.

However, Smirnov’s findings created their own mystery: the magnetic readings were significantly larger than anticipated. This could have implications for early life on earth.

Aleksey V. Smirnov, David A.D. Evans. Geomagnetic paleointensity at ∼2.41 Ga as recorded by the Widgiemooltha Dike Swarm, Western Australia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2015; 416: 35 DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.02.012

Britain’s oldest sauropod

Experts from the University of Manchester have identified Britain’s oldest sauropod dinosaur from a fossil bone discovered on the Yorkshire coast.

The vertebra (backbone) originates from a group of dinosaurs that includes the largest land animals to have ever walked on Earth. This new sauropod dinosaur, from the Middle Jurassic Period at about 176 million years old, was found near Whitby, Yorkshire, after it fell out of a cliff face. This find represents the earliest skeletal record of this type of dinosaur from the United Kingdom and adds to existing evidence from Yorkshire dinosaur tracks that this part of the country was once Britain’s very own ‘Jurassic World’.

Sauropods (often referred to as ‘brontosaurs’) include some of the largest plant-eating dinosaurs to have roamed the Earth and were a successful group for nearly 150 million years. They possessed distinctive long necks and tails, small heads, a large body and walked on all fours. Some species such as the Argentinosaurus grew up to 115 feet (35 metres) long and possibly weighed as much as 80 tonnes.

The fragmentary nature of the new find from Yorkshire means it is not possible to generate a new species of dinosaur. However, this fossil clearly belongs to this distinctive group of titanic sized animals, the sauropods. This dinosaur fossil is an extremely rare find, given the Middle Jurassic rocks of the world are only exposed in a few areas, such as China and Argentina where similar-aged dinosaur fossils originate.

Experts from the University of Manchester have identified Britain's oldest sauropod dinosaur from a fossil bone discovered on the Yorkshire coast. Credit: Jason Poole

Experts from the University of Manchester have identified Britain’s oldest sauropod dinosaur from a fossil bone discovered on the Yorkshire coast.
Credit: Jason Poole

Professor Phil Manning and his team from The University of Manchester used X-Ray Tomography to study the fossil bone, which is now held in the collections at the Yorkshire Museum in York (UK). They present their description of this new sauropod dinosaur in a paper published today in the journal PLOS ONE.

Professor Manning said: “Many scientists have worked on the amazing dinosaur tracks from the Middle Jurassic rocks of Yorkshire. It was a splendid surprise to come face-to-face with a fossil vertebra from the Jurassic rocks of Yorkshire that was clearly from a sauropod dinosaur

“This fossil offers the earliest ‘body fossil’ evidence for this important group of dinosaurs in the United Kingdom, but it is impossible to define a new species based upon this single bone.”

Whilst this is clearly frustrating for the team, there is possibly more of this Jurassic titan still to be discovered in the future and only then might it get a new species name. Until more bones are discovered the team have simply nicknamed Britain’s oldest sauropod dinosaur, ‘Alan’, after the finder of this prehistoric beastie (Alan Gurr).

Dr Victoria Egerton (co-author on the paper) added: “The Jurassic Park that was once Yorkshire clearly has much more to offer science in our understanding of the distribution and evolution of dinosaurs.”

Dr Mike Romano, another co-author on the paper said: “Dinosaur remains of Middle Jurassic age are generally rare, even on a global scale. So, to find a single distinctive vertebra of that age on the beach at Whitby, and one that represents a new taxon of sauropod dinosaurs, is indeed a (white) feather in the cap for Yorkshire.”

 Citation:Manchester University. “Britain’s oldest sauropod dinosaur identified from fossil bone that fell from a cliff face.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 1 June 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150601141523.htm>.

Ancient birds evolved specialist diving adaptations

A new study of some primitive birds from the Cretaceous shows how several separate lineages evolved adaptations for diving.

Living at the same time as the dinosaurs, Hesperornithiform bird fossils have been found in North America, Europe and Asia in rocks 65-95 million years old. Dr Alyssa Bell and Professor Luis Chiappe of the Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, publishing in the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, have undertaken a detailed analysis of their evolution, showing that separate lineages became progressively more adept at diving into water to catch fishes, like modern day loons and grebes.

Evolution of diving specializations within the Hesperornithiformes. Credit: Image courtesy of Taylor & Francis

Evolution of diving specializations within the Hesperornithiformes.
Credit: Image courtesy of Taylor & Francis

The Hesperornithiformes are a highly derived but very understudied group of primitive birds from the Cretaceous period. This study is the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, or evaluation of evolutionary relationships, to ever be undertaken on the entire group.

The results of this study confirm that the Hesperornithiformes do form a single group (or clade), but that within this group the inter-relationships of the different taxa are more complex than previously thought. Additionally, this study finds that anatomical changes were accompanied by enlargement in overall body size, which increased lung capacity and allowed deeper diving.

Overall, this study provides evidence for understanding the evolution of diving adaptations among the earliest known aquatic birds.

 Journal Reference:
  1. Alyssa Bell, Luis M. Chiappe. A species-level phylogeny of the Cretaceous Hesperornithiformes (Aves: Ornithuromorpha): implications for body size evolution amongst the earliest diving birds. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2015; 1 DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2015.1036141
Taylor & Francis. “Go fish! Ancient birds evolved specialist diving adaptations.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 22 May 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150522105222.htm>.

Dinosaurs were likely warm-blooded

Dinosaurs grew as fast as your average living mammal, according to a research paper published by Stony Brook University paleontologist Michael D’Emic, PhD. The paper, to published in Science on May 29, is a re-analysis of a widely publicized 2014 Science paper on dinosaur metabolism and growth that concluded dinosaurs were neither ectothermic nor endothermic — terms popularly simplified as ‘cold-blooded’ and ‘warm-blooded’ — but instead occupied an intermediate category.

“The study that I re-analyzed was remarkable for its breadth — the authors compiled an unprecedented dataset on growth and metabolism from studies of hundreds of living animals,” said Dr. D’Emic, a Research Instructor in the Department of Anatomical Sciences as Stony Brook, when referring to “Evidence for mesothermy in dinosaurs.”

“Upon re-analysis, it was apparent that dinosaurs weren’t just somewhat like living mammals in their physiology — they fit right within our understanding of what it means to be a ‘warm-blooded’ mammal,” he said.

Dr. D’Emic specializes in bone microanatomy, or the study of the structure of bone on scales that are just a fraction of the width of a human hair. Based on his knowledge of how dinosaurs grew, Dr. D’Emic re-analyzed that study, which led him to the strikingly different conclusion that dinosaurs were more like mammals than reptiles in their growth and metabolism.

A microscopic image of the thigh bone (femur) of a dinosaur shows concentric rings. Like tree rings, they formed each year in the dinosaur's bones during the season when resources were scarce. The rings represent unrecorded time, so an annual growth rate (dashed line in graph) is an underestimate relative to the true growth rate during the favorable growing season. Credit: Scott Hartman

A microscopic image of the thigh bone (femur) of a dinosaur shows concentric rings. Like tree rings, they formed each year in the dinosaur’s bones during the season when resources were scarce. The rings represent unrecorded time, so an annual growth rate (dashed line in graph) is an underestimate relative to the true growth rate during the favorable growing season.
Credit: Scott Hartman

Dr. D’Emic re-analyzed the study from two aspects. First, the original study had scaled yearly growth rates to daily ones in order to standardize comparisons.

“This is problematic,” Dr. D’Emic explains, “because many animals do not grow continuously throughout the year, generally slowing or pausing growth during colder, drier, or otherwise more stressful seasons.

“Therefore, the previous study underestimated dinosaur growth rates by failing to account for their uneven growth. Like most animals, dinosaurs slowed or paused their growth annually, as shown by rings in their bones analogous to tree rings,” he explained.

He added that the growth rates were especially underestimated for larger animals and animals that live in very stressful or seasonal environments — both of which characterize dinosaurs.

The second aspect of the re-analysis with the original study takes into account that dinosaurs should be statistically analyzed within the same group as living birds, which are also warm-blooded, because birds are descendants of Mesozoic dinosaurs.

“Separating what we commonly think of as ‘dinosaurs’ from birds in a statistical analysis is generally inappropriate, because birds are dinosaurs — they’re just the dinosaurs that haven’t gone extinct.”

He explained that re-analyzing the data with birds as dinosaurs lends more support that dinosaurs were ‘warm-blooded,’ not occupants of a special, intermediate metabolic category.

According to Holly Woodward, Assistant Professor in the Center for Health Sciences at Oklahoma State University, Dr. D’Emic’s re-analysis is crucial to building research on the metabolism and development of dinosaurs.

“D’Emic’s study reveals how important access to the data behind published results is for hypothesis testing and advancing our understanding of dinosaur growth dynamics,” said Woodward.

Dr. D’Emic hopes that his study will also spur new research into when, why, and how pauses or slowdowns in growth are recorded in bones, which may have implications in the development of other species and in the study of bone diseases such as osteoporosis.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmG1wyQ1h6g&feature=youtu.be

Journal References:

  1. M. D. D’Emic. Comment on “Evidence for mesothermy in dinosaurs”. Science, 2015 DOI: 10.1126/science.1260061
  2. J. M. Grady, B. J. Enquist, E. Dettweiler-Robinson, N. A. Wright, F. A. Smith. Evidence for mesothermy in dinosaurs. Science, 2014; 344 (6189): 1268 DOI: 10.1126/science.1253143
 Citation: Stony Brook University. “Dinosaurs were likely warm-blooded.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 28 May 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150528140937.htm>.

Laser-beam scanning illuminates new details in dinosaur fossils

A team of scientists based largely at the University of Kansas and the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture in Washington has developed methods of using commercial-grade laser equipment to find and analyze fossils of dinosaurs. Their techniques are introduced via a paper in the journal PLOS ONE today.

The new laser method causes fossil samples to fluoresce, revealing complex details unseen with traditional visual enhancers like ultraviolet light.

“Nobody else is doing this, as far as I know,” said David Burnham, preparator at KU’s Biodiversity Institute & Natural History Museum and a co-author on the paper. “Basically you want to excite electrons in the object so it emits photons you can see. This requires a camera filter of some kind, and that’s where an orange or yellow long-pass filter is used — it takes away everything else so we can see the photons.”

The authors first used lasers a few years ago during examination of a Microraptor specimen from China, when they noticed a second fossil in the surrounding material.

“We had a mystery fossil on the same piece,” Burnham said.

The KU researchers contacted Thomas Kaye of the Burke Museum for help identifying it. “We sent him the specimen, and he came up with this laser technique,” Burnham said.

Since then, the researchers have worked to fine-tune the laser-identification process, often using lasers on samples from Jehol Biota, a “mother lode” of 27-million-year-old fossils unearthed in the Chinese province of Liaoning.

“There have been many dinosaurs with feathers and scales that nobody has seen before because of this locality in China, where volcanic ash has preserved fossils much like in Pompeii,” Burnham said. “Tissues are preserved — not just the bones. With things like feathers, we can see details really well using lasers. If the fossils themselves won’t fluoresce, the background will. We can see if a primitive feather looks like a modern feather.”

Because high-end technology has become less expensive, the researchers have been able to buy medium-power short wavelength lasers on websites like eBay and experiment with digital photographic equipment and filters. Thus, they’ve developed novel uses for lasers, such as backlighting opaque specimens to reveal detail and even finding new fossils hidden within rocks or dirt.

“We’re finding that a blue hand-held laser is easiest to use — it’s sold by a company called Dragon Laser,” Burnham said. “You can buy them at different wavelengths and energy levels — you just have to be really careful to wear protective glasses.”

In the PLOS ONE paper, the researchers give examples of using lasers in various ways: silhouette illumination of carbon fibers, such as the feathers of a primitive bird; microscopic imaging of specimens fluorescing beneath the specimen surface to capture details; and in-situ analysis with minimal invasiveness, where the team analyzed the arm bracelet on the skeleton of a small girl from the mid-Holocene without removing or disturbing it, finding it was fashioned from a hippopotamus tooth.

Is this Microraptor skull a composite? (A) The skull under white light shows subtle color differences. (B) Under laser-light stimulation, the bone fluoresces from differences in fossil mineralogy, indicating the skull is likely a composite. Credit: KU News Service/University of Kansas

Is this Microraptor skull a composite? (A) The skull under white light shows subtle color differences. (B) Under laser-light stimulation, the bone fluoresces from differences in fossil mineralogy, indicating the skull is likely a composite.
Credit: KU News Service/University of Kansas

Indeed, the researchers have even developed a proof-of-concept automated fossil sorter that employs a laser beam to pick microfossils from surrounding rocks and dirt.

“The reason we collect microfossils is to find tiny little teeth and they preserve well because they’re enamel — the hardest substance body produces,” Burnham said. “You walk around, find fossils, take burlap sack and fill it with dirt, or matrix. Before, we’d bring it back to museum and go through it with a magnifying glass, separating things by hand, one by one — mostly getting rocks. To speed this up, now we have a machine that emits laser light and pops out the teeth.”

Beyond these applications, the KU researcher said that lasers would allow paleontologists to spot phony fossils, or specimens cobbled together from many fossils and passed off as whole. This is because bones from different places or times would emit dissimilar fluorescence once exposed to laser light.

“It allows us to detect fakes,” Burnham said. “It’s been going on ever since man has been around. People are trying to make the specimen look better or more intact. Museums want pretty things, so people doctor these up to make them look better. People do it fraudulently because they’re easier to sell when you make something more complete. Some artists are so good you can’t tell where the real thing stops and the fake thing begins. With lasers, now we’ll know.”

Citation:University of Kansas. “Laser-beam scanning illuminates new details in dinosaur fossils.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 27 May 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150527180908.htm>.


What did the first snakes look like?

The original snake ancestor was a nocturnal, stealth-hunting predator that had tiny hindlimbs with ankles and toes, according to research published in the open access journal BMC Evolutionary Biology.

The study, led by Yale University, USA, analyzed fossils, genes, and anatomy from 73 snake and lizard species, and suggests that snakes first evolved on land, not in the sea, which contributes to a longstanding debate. They most likely originated in the warm, forested ecosystems of the Southern Hemisphere around 128 million years ago.

This is a reconstruction of the ancestral crown-group snake, based on this study. Artwork by Julius Csotonyi. Credit: Julius Csotonyi

This is a reconstruction of the ancestral crown-group snake, based on this study. Artwork by Julius Csotonyi.
Credit: Julius Csotonyi

Snakes show incredible diversity, with over 3,400 living species found in a wide range of habitats, such as land, water and in trees. But little is known about where and when they evolved, and how their original ancestor looked and behaved.

Lead author Allison Hsiang said: “While snake origins have been debated for a long time, this is the first time these hypotheses have been tested thoroughly using cutting-edge methods. By analyzing the genes, fossils and anatomy of 73 different snake and lizard species, both living and extinct, we’ve managed to generate the first comprehensive reconstruction of what the ancestral snake was like.”

By identifying similarities and differences between species, the team constructed a large family tree and illustrated the major characteristics that have played out throughout snake evolutionary history.

Their results suggest that snakes originated on land, rather than in water, during the middle Early Cretaceous period (around 128.5 million years ago), and most likely came from the ancient supercontinent of Laurasia. This period coincides with the rapid appearance of many species of mammals and birds on Earth.

The ancestral snake likely possessed a pair of tiny hindlimbs, and targeted soft-bodied vertebrate and invertebrate prey that were relatively large in size compared to prey targeted by lizards at the time. While the snake was not limited to eating very small animals, it had not yet developed the ability to manipulate prey much larger than itself by using constriction as a form of attack, as seen in modern Boa constrictors.

While many ancestral reptiles were most active during the daytime (diurnal), the ancestral snake is thought to have been nocturnal. Diurnal habits later returned around 50-45 million years ago with the appearance of Colubroidea — the family of snakes that now make up over 85% of living snake species. As colder night time temperatures may have limited nocturnal activity, the researchers say that the success of Colubroidea may have been facilitated by the return of these diurnal habits.

The results suggest that the success of snakes in occupying a range of habitats over their evolutionary history is partly due to their skills as ‘dispersers’. Snakes are estimated to be able to travel ranges up to 110,000 square kilometres, around 4.5 times larger than lizards. They are also able to inhabit environments that traditionally hinder the dispersal of terrestrial animals, having invaded aquatic habitats multiple times in their evolutionary history.

Journal Reference:

  1. Allison Y Hsiang, Daniel J Field, Timothy H Webster, Adam DB Behlke, Matthew B Davis, Rachel A Racicot, Jacques A Gauthier. The origin of snakes: revealing the ecology, behavior, and evolutionary history of early snakes using genomics, phenomics, and the fossil record. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2015; 15 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0358-5

Citation: BioMed Central. “What did the first snakes look like?.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 19 May 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150519210253.htm>.

Probing iron chemistry in the deep mantle

Carbonates are a group of minerals that contain the carbonate ion (CO32-) and a metal, such as iron or magnesium. Carbonates are important constituents of marine sediments and are heavily involved in the planet’s deep carbon cycle, primarily due to oceanic crust sinking into the mantle, a process called subduction. During subduction, carbonates interact with other minerals, which alter their chemical compositions. The concentrations of the metals gained by carbonate ions during these interactions are of interest to those who study deep earth chemistry cycles.

Rearrangement of the electrons in iron upon pressure-induced spin transition in carbonates. Credit: Sergey Lobanov

Rearrangement of the electrons in iron upon pressure-induced spin transition in carbonates.
Credit: Sergey Lobanov

Carbonates were known to exist in the upper mantle due to their role in the deep carbon cycle. But it was thought that they could not withstand the more-extreme conditions of the lower mantle. Laboratory experiments and the discovery of tiny bits of carbonate impurities in lower mantle diamonds indicated that carbonates could withstand the extreme pressures and temperatures of not only the upper mantle, but the lower mantle as well.

Previous research had shown that upper mantle carbonates are magnesium-rich and iron-poor. Under lower mantle conditions, it is thought that the arrangement of electrons in carbonate minerals changes under the pressure stress in such a way that iron may be significantly redistributed. However, accurate observations of lower mantle carbonates’ chemical composition are not possible yet.

A research team–Carnegie’s Sergey Lobanov and Alexander Goncharov, along with Konstantin Litasov of the Russian Academy of Science and Novosibirsk State University in Russia–focused on the high-pressure chemistry of a carbonate mineral called siderite, which is an iron carbonate, FeCO3, commonly found in hydrothermal vents. Their findings help resolve questions about the presence of iron-containing lower mantle carbonates, and are published by American Mineralogist.

Until recently the electron-arrangement change responsible for iron redistribution in the lower mantle had not been measured in the lab. It was previously discovered that this change, a phenomenon called a spin transition, took place between about 424,000 and 484,000 times normal atmospheric pressure (43 to 49 gigapascals).The team was able to pinpoint that spin transition was occurring in iron carbonates under about 434,000 times normal atmospheric pressure (44 gigapascals), typical of the lower mantle.

A spin transition is a rearrangement of electrons in a molecule or a mineral. Electrons hold a compound’s atoms together by bonding. Certain fundamental rules of chemistry govern this bonding process, which have to do with the energy it takes to form the bonds. Pressure-induced spin transitions rearrange electrons and change the energy of the chemical bonds. If the change in chemical bond energy is high enough, the spin transition may trigger iron redistribution between coexisting minerals.

To quantify the energy change, siderite’s spin transition was examined using highly sensitive spectroscopic techniques at pressures ranging from zero to about 711,000 times normal atmospheric pressure (72 gigapascals), and also revealed by a visible color change after the transition, indicating rearrangement of electrons. The obtained spectroscopic data provided the key ingredient to estimating the carbonate composition at pressures exceeding the spin transition-pressure. It turned out that lower mantle carbonates should be iron-rich, unlike upper mantle carbonates. Similar effects may exist in other lower mantle minerals, if they also undergo spin transitions.

“As we learn more about how the spin transition affects chemical composition in carbonates, we improve our understanding of all iron-bearing minerals, enhancing our knowledge about lower mantle chemistry,” said Lobanov.

Citation: Carnegie Institution. “Probing iron chemistry in the deep mantle.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 15 May 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150515175100.htm>.

Digital dinosaurs: Restore dinosaur fossil

Fossils are usually deformed or incompletely preserved when they are found, after sometimes millions of years of fossilization processes. Consequently, fossils have to be studied very carefully to avoid damage, and are sometimes they are difficult to access, as they might be located in remote museum collections. An international team of scientists, led by Dr. Stephan Lautenschlager from the University of Bristol now solved some of these problems by using modern computer technology, as described in a recent issue of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

The team consisting of Dr. Stephan Lautenschlager and Professor Emily Rayfield from the University of Bristol, Professor Lindsay Zanno from the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences and North Carolina State University, Dr. Perle Altangerel from the National University of Ulaanbaatar, and Professor Lawrence Witmer from Ohio University employed high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT scanning) and digital visualisation techniques to restore a rare dinosaur fossil.

Lead author, Dr. Stephan Lautenschlager of Bristol’s School of Earth Sciences said: “With modern computer technology, such as CT scanning and digital visualisation, we now have powerful tools at our disposal, with which we can get a step closer to restore fossil animals to their life-like condition.”

The focus of the study was the skull of Erlikosaurus andrewsi, a 3-4m (10-13ft) large herbivorous dinosaur called a therizinosaur, which lived more than 90 million years ago during the Cretaceous Period in what is now Mongolia.

This image shows a comparison between originally preserved and digitally restored skull of the Cretaceous dinosaur Erlikosaurus andrewsi. – Image courtesy Journal of Vertebrate PaImage courtesy Journal of Vertebrate Paleontologyleontology

This image shows a comparison between originally preserved and digitally restored skull of the Cretaceous dinosaur Erlikosaurus andrewsi. – Image courtesy Journal of Vertebrate PaImage courtesy Journal of Vertebrate Paleontologyleontology

“The fossil skull of Erlikosaurus andrewsi is one-of-a-kind and the most complete and best preserved example known for this group of dinosaurs. As such it is of high scientific value” explains co-author Professor Emily Rayfield.

Using a digital model of the fossil, the team virtually disassembled the skull of Erlikosaurus into its individual elements. Then they digitally filled in any breaks and cracks in the bones, duplicated missing elements and removed deformation by applying retro-deformation techniques, digitally reversing the steps of deformation. In a final step, the reconstructed elements were re-assembled. This approach not only allowed the restoration of the complete skull of Erlikosaurus, but also the study of its individual elements.

However, using digital models has further advantages adds Dr. Lawrence Witmer: “Digital models allow the study of the external and internal features of a fossil. Furthermore, they can be shared quickly amongst researchers – without any risk to the actual fossil and without having to travel hundreds or even thousands of miles to see the original.”

Co-author, Dr. Lindsay Zanno agrees: “Therizinosaurs , with their pot bellies and comically enlarged claws, are arguably the most bizarre theropod dinosaurs. We know a lot about their oddball skeletons from the neck down, but this is the first time we’ve been able to digitally dissect an entire skull.”
Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology

New evidence for combat and cannibalism in tyrannosaurs

A new study documents injuries inflicted in life and death to a large tyrannosaurine dinosaur. The paper shows that the skull of a genus of tyrannosaur called Daspletosaurus suffered numerous injuries during life, at least some of which were likely inflicted by another Daspletosaurus. It was also bitten after death in an apparent event of scavenging by another tyrannosaur. Thus there’s evidence of combat between two large carnivores as well as one feeding on another after death.

Daspletosaurus was a large carnivore that lived in Canada and was only a little smaller than its more famous cousin Tyrannosaurus. Like other tyrannosaurs it was most likely both an active predator and scavenger. The individual in question, from Alberta Canada, was not fully grown and would be considered a ‘sub-adult’ in dinosaur terms (approximately equivalent to an older teenager in human terms). It would have been just under 6 m long and around 500 kg when it died.

his is an artist's reconstruction of combat between two Daspletosaurus. Credit: Copyright Luis Rey

This is an artist’s reconstruction of combat between two Daspletosaurus.
Credit: Copyright Luis Rey

Researchers found numerous injuries on the skull that occurred during life. Although not all of them can be attributed to bites, several are close in shape to the teeth of tyrannosaurs. In particular one bite to the back of the head had broken off part of the skull and left a circular tooth-shaped puncture though the bone. The fact that alterations to the bone’s surface indicate healing means that these injuries were not fatal and the animal lived for some time after they were inflicted.

Lead author Dr David Hone from Queen Mary, University of London said “This animal clearly had a tough life suffering numerous injuries across the head including some that must have been quite nasty. The most likely candidate to have done this is another member of the same species, suggesting some serious fights between these animals during their lives.”

There is no evidence that the animal died at the hands (or mouth) of another tyrannosaur. However, the preservation of the skull and other bones, and damage to the jaw bones show that after the specimen began to decay, a large tyrannosaur (possibly of the same species) bit into the animal and presumably ate at least part of it.

Combat between large carnivorous dinosaurs is already known and there is already evidence for cannibalism in various groups, including tyrannosaurs. This is however an apparently unique record with evidence of both pre- and post-mortem injuries to a single individual.

Courtesy: PeerJ. “New evidence for combat and cannibalism in tyrannosaurs.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 9 April 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150409083201.htm>.