Gomphothere mandible uncovered

An animal once believed to have disappeared from North America before humans ever arrived there might actually have roamed the continent longer than previously thought — and it was likely on the list of prey for some of continent’s earliest humans, researchers from the University of Arizona and elsewhere have found.

Archaeologists have discovered artifacts of the prehistoric Clovis culture mingled with the bones of two gomphotheres, ancient ancestors of the elephant, at an archaeological site in northwestern Mexico.

The discovery suggests that the Clovis — the earliest widespread group of hunter-gatherers to inhabit North America — likely hunted and ate gomphotheres. The members of the Clovis culture were already well-known as hunters of the gomphotheres’ cousins, mammoths and mastodons.

Although humans were known to have hunted gomphotheres in Central America and South America, this is the first time a human-gomphothere connection has been made in North America, says archaeologist Vance Holliday, who co-authored a new paper on the findings, published this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Gomphothere mandible uncovered at El Fin del Mundo. Archaeologists working in northwestern Mexico were not sure what kind of animal they had unearthed until they found this telltale jawbone, which belonged to a gomphothere. Credit: Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales

Gomphothere mandible uncovered at El Fin del Mundo. Archaeologists working in northwestern Mexico were not sure what kind of animal they had unearthed until they found this telltale jawbone, which belonged to a gomphothere.
Credit: Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales

“This is the first archaeological gomphothere found in North America, and it’s the only one known,” said Holliday, a professor of anthropology and geology at the UA.

Holliday and colleagues from the U.S. and Mexico began excavating the skeletal remains of two juvenile gomphotheres in 2007 after ranchers alerted them that the bones had been found in northwestern Sonora, Mexico.

They didn’t know at first what kind of animal they were dealing with.

“At first, just based on the size of the bone, we thought maybe it was a bison, because the extinct bison were a little bigger than our modern bison,” Holliday said.

Then, in 2008, they discovered a jawbone with teeth, buried upside down in the dirt.

“We finally found the mandible, and that’s what told the tale,” Holliday said.

Gomphotheres were smaller than mammoths — about the same size as modern elephants. They once were widespread in North America, but until now they seemed to have disappeared from the continent’s fossil record long before humans arrived in North America, which happened some 13,000 to 13,500 years ago, during the late Ice Age.

However, the bones that Holliday and his colleagues uncovered date back 13,400 years, making them the last known gomphotheres in North America.

The gomphothere remains weren’t all Holliday and his colleagues unearthed at the site, which they dubbed El Fin del Mundo — Spanish for The End of the World — because of its remote location.

As their excavation of the bones progressed, they also uncovered numerous Clovis artifacts, including signature Clovis projectile points, or spear tips, as well as cutting tools and flint flakes from stone tool-making. The Clovis culture is so named for its distinctive stone tools, first discovered by archaeologists near Clovis, New Mexico, in the 1930s.

Radiocarbon dating, done at the UA, puts the El Fin del Mundo site at about 13,400 years old, making it one of the two oldest known Clovis sites in North America; the other is the Aubrey Clovis site in north Texas.

The position and proximity of Clovis weapon fragments relative to the gomphothere bones at the site suggest that humans did in fact kill the two animals there. Of the seven Clovis points found at the site, four were in place among the bones, including one with bone and teeth fragments above and below. The other three points had clearly eroded away from the bone bed and were found scattered nearby.

“This is the first Clovis gomphothere, it’s the first archaeological gomphothere found in North America, it’s the first evidence that people were hunting gomphotheres in North America, and it adds another item to the Clovis menu,” Holliday said.

The dig at El Fin del Mundo, a joint effort between the U.S. and Mexico, was funded by the UA School of Anthropology’s Argonaut Archaeological Research Fund, the National Geographic Society, the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and The Center for Desert Archaeology in Tucson.

In addition to Holliday, authors of the PNAS paper include: lead author Guadalupe Sanchez, who has a doctorate in anthropology from the UA; UA alumni Edmund P. Gaines and Susan M. Mentzer; UA doctoral candidates Natalia Martínez-Tagüeña and Andrew Kowler; UA master’s student Ismael Sanchez-Morales; UA scientists Todd Lange and Gregory Hodgins; and Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales at the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

First Record of Eocene Bony Fishes and Crocodyliforms from Canada’s Western Arctic

Discovery of Eocene non-marine vertebrates, including crocodylians, turtles, bony fishes, and mammals in Canada’s High Arctic was a critical paleontological contribution of the last century because it indicated that this region of the Arctic had been mild, temperate, and ice-free during the early – middle Eocene (~53–50 Ma), despite being well above the Arctic Circle. To date, these discoveries have been restricted to Canada’s easternmost Arctic – Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg Islands (Nunavut). Although temporally correlative strata crop out over 1,000 km west, on Canada’s westernmost Arctic Island – Banks Island, Northwest Territories – they have been interpreted as predominantly marine. We document the first Eocene bony fish and crocodyliform fossils from Banks Island.

Principal Findings

We describe fossils of bony fishes, including lepisosteid (Atractosteus), esocid (pike), and amiid, and a crocodyliform, from lower – middle Eocene strata of the Cyclic Member, Eureka Sound Formation within Aulavik National Park (~76°N. paleolat.). Palynology suggests the sediments are late early to middle Eocene in age, and likely spanned the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO).

Conclusions/Significance

These fossils extend the geographic range of Eocene Arctic lepisosteids, esocids, amiids, and crocodyliforms west by approximately 40° of longitude or ~1100 km. The low diversity bony fish fauna, at least at the family level, is essentially identical on Ellesmere and Banks Islands, suggesting a pan-High Arctic bony fish fauna of relatively basal groups around the margin of the Eocene Arctic Ocean. From a paleoclimatic perspective, presence of a crocodyliform, gar and amiid fishes on northern Banks provides further evidence that mild, year-round temperatures extended across the Canadian Arctic during early – middle Eocene time. Additionally, the Banks Island crocodyliform is consistent with the phylogenetic hypothesis of a Paleogene divergence time between the two extant alligatorid lineages Alligator mississippiensis and A. sinensis, and high-latitude dispersal across Beringia.

Citation: Eberle JJ, Gottfried MD, Hutchison JH, Brochu CA (2014) First Record of Eocene Bony Fishes and Crocodyliforms from Canada’s Western Arctic. PLoS ONE 9(5): e96079. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096079

Editor: Peter Dodson, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America

CMNFV 56059, vertebral centrum of an Eocene crocodyliform from CMN Loc. BKS04-19 on northern Banks Island, NWT.  (A) Left lateral view; (B) dorsal view; (C) ventral view. h, hypapophysis; ncs, neurocentral sutural surface; pc, posterior cotyle. Scale bar equals 5 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096079.g003

CMNFV 56059, vertebral centrum of an Eocene crocodyliform from CMN Loc. BKS04-19 on northern Banks Island, NWT.
(A) Left lateral view; (B) dorsal view; (C) ventral view. h, hypapophysis; ncs, neurocentral sutural surface; pc, posterior cotyle. Scale bar equals 5 mm.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096079.g003

 

Fossils of Eocene bony fishes from northern Banks Island, NWT.  CMNFV 56070, lateral line scale of Atractosteus from CMN Loc. BKS04-16, in medial (A) and lateral (B) views. (C) CMNFV 56069, vertebral centrum of ?Amiid. (D) CMNFV 56071, Esocid scale. C and D are from CMN Loc. BKS04-19.  doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096079.g002

Fossils of Eocene bony fishes from northern Banks Island, NWT.
CMNFV 56070, lateral line scale of Atractosteus from CMN Loc. BKS04-16, in medial (A) and lateral (B) views. (C) CMNFV 56069, vertebral centrum of ?Amiid. (D) CMNFV 56071, Esocid scale. C and D are from CMN Loc. BKS04-19.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096079.g002

Earthquakes: Friction and Fracture are interrelated

Overturning conventional wisdom stretching all the way to Leonardo da Vinci, new Hebrew University of Jerusalem research shows that how things break (fracture) and how things slide (friction) are closely interrelated. The breakthrough study marks an important advance in understanding friction and fracture, with implications for describing the mechanics that drive earthquakes.

Over 500 years ago, da Vinci described how rough blocks slide over one another, providing the basis for our understanding of friction to this day. The phenomenon of fracture was always considered to be something totally different.

But new research by Prof. Jay Fineberg and his graduate student Ilya Svetlizky, at the Hebrew University’s Racah Institute of Physics, has demonstrated that these two seemingly disparate processes of fracture and friction are actually intimately intertwined.

Appearing in the journal Nature, their findings create a new paradigm that’s very different from the da Vinci version, and, according to the researchers, give us a new understanding of how earthquakes actually occur.

Fineberg and Svetlizky produced “laboratory earthquakes” showing that the friction caused by the sliding of two contacting blocks can only occur when the connections between the surfaces are first ruptured (that is, fractured or broken) in an orderly, “organized” process that takes place at nearly the speed of sound.

How does this happen? Before any motion can occur, the blocks are connected by interlocking rough contacts that define their interface. In order for motion to occur, these connections have to be broken. This physical process of breaking is called a fracture process. This process is described by the theory of crack propagation, say the researchers, meaning that the stresses (or forces) that exist at the front edge of a crack become highly magnified, even if the overall forces being applied are initially quite small.

“The insights gained from our study provide a new paradigm for understanding friction and give us a new, fundamental description of the mechanics and behavior that drive earthquakes, the sliding of two tectonic blocks within natural faults,” says Fineberg. “In this way, we can now understand important processes that are generally hidden kilometers beneath the Earth’s surface.”

The research was supported by the James S. McDonnell Fund, the European Research Council (grant no. 267256) and the Israel Science Foundation (grant 76/11).

Shark teeth analysis provides detailed new look at Arctic climate change

Source : University of Chicago

A new study shows that some shark species may be able to cope with the rising salinity of Arctic waters that may come with rising temperatures.

The Arctic today is best known for its tundra and polar bear population, but it wasn’t always like that. Roughly 53 to 38 million years ago during what is known as the Eocene epoch, the Arctic was more similar to a huge temperate forest with brackish water, home to a variety of animal life, including ancestors of tapirs, hippo-like creatures, crocodiles and giant tortoises. Much of what is known about the region during this period comes from well-documented terrestrial deposits. Marine records have been harder to come by.

A new study of shark teeth taken from a coastal Arctic Ocean site has expanded the understanding of Eocene marine life. Leading the study was Sora Kim, the T.C. Chamberlin Postdoctoral Fellow in Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago, in coordination with Jaelyn Eberle at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and their three co-authors. Their findings were published online June 30 by the journal Geology.

The Arctic is of special interest today because it is increasing in temperature at twice the global rate. According to Kim, past climate change in the Arctic can serve as a proxy to better understand our current climate change and aid future predictions. The Eocene epoch, she said, is like a “deep-time analogue for what’s going to happen if we don’t curb CO2 emissions today, and potentially what a runaway greenhouse effect looks like.”

Before this study, marine records primarily came from deep-sea cores pulled from a central Arctic Ocean site, the Lomonosov Ridge. Kim and Eberle studied shark teeth from a new coastal site on Banks Island. This allowed them to better understand the changes in ocean water salinity across a broader geographic area during a time of elevated global temperatures. Shark teeth are one of the few available vertebrate marine fossils for this time period. They preserve well and are incredibly abundant.

To arrive at their results, Kim isolated and measured the mass ratio of oxygen isotopes 18 to 16 found in the prepared enameloid (somewhat different from human tooth enamel) of the shark teeth. Sharks constantly exchange water with their environment, so the isotopic oxygen ratio found in the teeth is directly regulated by water temperature and salinity. With assumptions made about temperatures, the group was able to focus on extrapolating salinity levels of the water.

The results were surprising. “The numbers I got back were really weird,” Kim said. “They looked like fresh water.” The sand tiger sharks she was studying are part of a group called lamniform sharks, which prefer to stay in areas of high salinity.

Both graceful and docile, this modern sandtiger shark swims through a school of round scad fish in the coastal waters off North Carolina. Modern sand tigers prefer waters of high salinity, though they tolerate brackish waters for short periods as well. Credit: Erik Rebeck

Both graceful and docile, this modern sandtiger shark swims through a school of round scad fish in the coastal waters off North Carolina. Modern sand tigers prefer waters of high salinity, though they tolerate brackish waters for short periods as well.
Credit: Erik Rebeck

“As more freshwater flows into the Arctic Ocean due to global warming, I think we are going to see it become more brackish,” said Eberle, associate professor of geological sciences at CU-Boulder. “Maybe the fossil record can shed some light on how the groups of sharks that are with us today may fare in a warming world.”

Because the teeth are 40 to 50 million years old, many tests were run to eliminate any possible contaminates, but the results were still the same. These findings suggest that sharks may be able to cope with rises in temperature and the subsequent decrease of water salinity. It has long been known that sharks are hardy creatures. They have fossil records dating back some 400 million years, surviving multiple mass extinctions, and have shown great ecological plasticity thus far.

Additionally, these results provide supporting evidence for the idea that the Arctic Ocean was most likely isolated from global waters.

“Through an analysis of fossil sand tiger shark teeth from the western Arctic Ocean, this study offers new evidence for a less salty Arctic Ocean during an ancient ‘greenhouse period,'” said Yusheng (Chris) Liu, program director in the National Science Foundation (NSF)’s Division of Earth Sciences, which co-funded the research with NSF’s Division of Polar Programs. “The results also confirm that the Arctic Ocean was isolated during that long-ago time.”

While Kim has hopes to expand her research both geographically and in geologic time in an effort to better understand the ecology and evolution of sharks, she remarked that “working with fossils is tricky because you have to work within the localities that are preserved. “You can’t always design the perfect experiment.”

Ancient amber revealed one secret

The warm beauty of amber was captivating and mysterious enough to inspire myths in ancient times, and even today, some of its secrets remain locked inside the fossilized tree resin. But for the first time, scientists have now solved at least one of its puzzles that had perplexed them for decades. Their report on a key aspect of the gemstone’s architecture appears in the ACS journal Analytical Chemistry.

Jennifer Poulin and Kate Helwig of the Canadian Conservation Institute point out that much of the amber we see today had its origins millions of years ago, when it exuded from trees and then fossilized over time. Some of the oldest recovered samples even predate the rise of dinosaurs — and could outlast even the most advanced materials that science can make today. But it’s exactly that extreme durability that has made amber’s internal structure so difficult to understand. Scientists have used one particular technique to probe the inner molecular architecture of the ancient resin, but the process seemed to destroy evidence of certain relationships between compounds. Poulin and Helwig decided to try a new approach.

Studying this Canadian amber from the Late Cretaceous period, scientists have revealed one of its long-held secrets. Credit: © Government of Canada, Canadian Conservation Institute, CCI 123773-0025

Studying this Canadian amber from the Late Cretaceous period, scientists have revealed one of its long-held secrets.
Credit: © Government of Canada, Canadian Conservation Institute, CCI 123773-0025

Building on past attempts using something called pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, they slowed down the pyrolysis phase, which essentially uses heat to break down a substance. By doing so, the researchers were able to show that specific groups of atoms within their samples were bound to succinic acid, known historically as “spirit of amber.” “There can be no doubt that much of the stability and durability of certain kinds of amber comes from the succinic acid cross-linking within the matrix,” the researchers said.

Source:American Chemical Society. “One secret of ancient amber revealed.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 9 July 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140709140201.htm>.

Fossilized Elephant Tusk Found on Seafloor

A fossilized elephant tusk at least 100,000 years old has been discovered on the seafloor off the Sicilian coast, according to a survey of underwater archaeologists.

Discovered during a series of archaeological dives in the waters off Torretta Granitola, a village on the island’s southwestern coast, the tusk is more than 3 feet long.

“It was found embedded on the sea bottom in Pleistocene alluvional deposits,” the Superintendency of Maritime Cultural Heritage of Sicily said in a statement.

fossilized elephant tusk at least 100,000 years old has been discovered on the seafloor off the Sicilian coast

fossilized elephant tusk at least 100,000 years old has been discovered on the seafloor off the Sicilian coast

In the same area, Giampaolo Mirabile, a local diver, found some years ago two molar teeth belonging to the dwarf elephant Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis, or Elephas Mnaidriensis, a species that roamed Sicily between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago.

“The tusk’ size confirms the previous finding and points to the same extinct species,” Sebastiano Tusa, Sicily’s superintendent of the Sea Office, said.Tusa, who dived to the site with Giampaolo Mirabile, Gaetano Lino and Alessandro Urbano, also noticed what appeared like elephant footprints near the tusk.

“It’s clear now that the elephant’s disarticulated remains are spread in a limited area, embedded in a pebble conglomerate which is the result of alluvional deposits,” Tusa said.

Not far from the fossil find, the archaeologist also discovered numerous lumps of flint. Since the flints lay at a depth of about 13 feet, it is possible they represents the remains of a ship and its cargo.

But there might be a more likely explanation.“Flint was used in the manufacture of tools since the most remote prehistory, mostly in Paleolithic and Neolithic times,” Tusa said.“Most likely, that site now covered by water was once a prehistoric settlement. It was later destroyed by the (rising) sea level,” Tusa said.

Image: Fossiized elephant tusk embedded on the seafloor off the Sicilian coast. Credit: Soprintendenza del Mare della Regione Siciliana.

Argentavis magnificens: Largest Prehistoric Bird

Scientists have identified the fossilized remains of an extinct giant bird that could be the biggest flying bird ever found. With an estimated 20-24-foot wingspan, the creature surpassed size estimates based on wing bones from the previous record holder — a long-extinct bird named Argentavis magnificens — and was twice as big as the Royal Albatross, the largest flying bird today. Scheduled to appear online the week of July 7, 2014, in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the findings show that the creature was an extremely efficient glider, with long slender wings that helped it stay aloft despite its enormous size.

The new fossil was first unearthed in 1983 near Charleston, South Carolina, when construction workers began excavations for a new terminal at the Charleston International Airport. The specimen was so big they had to dig it out with a backhoe. “The upper wing bone alone was longer than my arm,” said author Dan Ksepka of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, North Carolina.

This is a reconstruction of the world's largest-ever flying bird, Pelagornis sandersi, identified by Daniel Ksepka, Curator of Science at the Bruce Museum in Greenwich, Conn. Reconstruction art is by Liz Bradford. Credit: Liz Bradford

This is a reconstruction of the world’s largest-ever flying bird, Pelagornis sandersi, identified by Daniel Ksepka, Curator of Science at the Bruce Museum in Greenwich, Conn. Reconstruction art is by Liz Bradford.
Credit: Liz Bradford

Now in the collections at the Charleston Museum, the strikingly well-preserved specimen consisted of multiple wing and leg bones and a complete skull. Its sheer size and telltale beak allowed Ksepka to identify the find as a previously unknown species of pelagornithid, an extinct group of giant seabirds known for bony tooth-like spikes that lined their upper and lower jaws. Named ‘Pelagornis sandersi‘ in honor of retired Charleston Museum curator Albert Sanders, who led the fossil’s excavation, the bird lived 25 to 28 million years ago — after the dinosaurs died out but long before the first humans arrived in the area.

Researchers have no doubt that P. sandersi flew. It’s paper-thin hollow bones, stumpy legs and giant wings would have made it at home in the air but awkward on land. But because it exceeded what some mathematical models say is the maximum body size possible for flying birds, what was less clear was how it managed to take off and stay aloft despite its massive size.

To find out, Ksepka fed the fossil data into a computer program designed to predict flight performance given various estimates of mass, wingspan and wing shape. P. sandersi was probably too big to take off simply by flapping its wings and launching itself into the air from a standstill, analyses show. Like Argentavis, whose flight was described by a computer simulation study in 2007, P. sandersi may have gotten off the ground by running downhill into a headwind or taking advantage of air gusts to get aloft, much like a hang glider.

Once it was airborne, Ksepka’s simulations suggest that the bird’s long, slender wings made it an incredibly efficient glider. By riding on air currents that rise up from the ocean’s surface, P. sandersi was able to soar for miles over the open ocean without flapping its wings, occasionally swooping down to the water to feed on soft-bodied prey like squid and eels.

“That’s important in the ocean, where food is patchy,” said Ksepka, who is now Curator of Science at the Bruce Museum in Greenwich Connecticut.

Researchers hope the find will help shed light on why the family of birds that P. sandersi belonged to eventually died out, and add to our understanding of how the giants of the skies managed to fly.

Ammonite fossil discovered in Hawkes Bay

The fossil of a squid-like creature wiped out with the dinosaurs has been discovered in a Hawkes Bay streambed.

The surprise find of the ammonite fossil – found contained in a 50kg boulder in the Waiau River – has excited scientists about what other specimens may lay hidden in New Zealand’s under-explored wilderness.

The uncovered ammonite, which lived in the sea during the time of the dinosaurs, had a flat spiral shell that looked something like a Paper Nautilus but was between 80cm and 90cm in diameter – large compared to most other ammonites.

The species belonged to a group of predators known as cephalopods, whose living relatives include the octopus and squid.

Its shell was coiled like a snail’s and comprised a series of water-tight compartments that enabled it to float and swim in the upper layers of the sea.

Scientists say the new fossil is significant not just because of its size – most found in that part of New Zealand are just a few centimetres in diameter – but also because of its age.

It was found in strata created 85 million years ago, making it one of the youngest fossilised ammonites found here.

Although found relatively frequently elsewhere, ammonite fossils are rare in New Zealand, for reasons not yet completely understood.

“We don’t have a significant record of these creatures in New Zealand so this find adds considerably to what we know about New Zealand paleontological history and about what was living here at that time,” said GNS paleontologist Dr James Crampton, who found the fossil with collections manager John Simes during a “rock kicking” walk up the river.

“It may help us understand more about why ammonites were so seemingly rare here when they appear to have been so common in other places.

“Even back then, it would seem, there was something unusual about New Zealand’s marine environment.”

The find demonstrates just how much more there was to be discovered in New Zealand’s rich but under-explored fossil record, large parts of which were tucked away in inaccessible, moss-hung and waterfall-blocked streams in our remote mountains.

The river where the fossil was found borders the Maungataniwha Native Forest, near where celebrated New Zealand paleontologist Joan Wiffen first discovered evidence of land-dinosaur fossils in New Zealand.

At the time the ammonite existed, New Zealand had already been torn away from the super-continent Gondwanaland in much the same way as California was being wrenched from the North American continent today by the San Andreas fault.

Not long afterwards, a giant asteroid hit Earth and ammonites, along with dinosaurs, became extinct.

Dr Crampton said the Waiau River bed was particularly important to paleontologists because it had carved its way through a succession of geological layers.

“Walking along the Waiau is like walking back in time,” he said.

“In geological terms it takes us deeper and deeper below the earth’s surface without us having to dig an inch.”

It was likely that the area held a wealth of secrets that could one day unlock the answers to a wide array of questions that science still has.

“If we can wander randomly up a stream-bed and pick up a fossil of this significance, in the same way as Joan Wiffen did all those years before us, imagine what we’ll unearth when we really start looking.”

The GNS team will attempt to remove the entire fossil from the 50kg boulder it was contained within, with the aim of displaying it at its offices in Lower Hutt.

NZ Herald

Scientists Discover Why Female Dinosaurs Laid Smaller Eggs

A team of researchers have discovered that though dinosaurs were the largest creatures to have ever walked on Earth, they did not lay the world’s largest eggs. Both individual egg size and clutch size of sauropods, one of the largest group of dinosaurs, were found to be a lot smaller than previously thought.

Sauropods, including diplodocus, apatosaurs and other such giants, had long necks, with smaller heads and measured up to 33 meters in length and 16,000 kilograms in weight. These creatures roamed the Earth billions of years ago. Yet, they laid relatively smaller eggs like those of modern egg-laying animals.

The team including biologists from the University of Lincoln, UK and George Mason University, Virginia, US, along with Graeme Ruxton, the lead researcher from University of St Andrews, used data from modern reptiles and birds and compared the factors responsible for the smaller clutch size in sauropods.

Ostrich, the living bird with the largest eggs, incubates its eggs for 42 days. It is during this time that the bird loses many of its eggs to predators.

“The living bird with the largest eggs, the ostrich, has to incubate its eggs for 42 days; during which time many eggs are lost to predators. An ostrich weighs about 100 kg and lays a 1.5 kg egg; a sauropod dinosaur might be 50 times heavier than an adult ostrich but its eggs were only a little heavier than an ostrich egg. Some people might find it a bit disappointing that giant dinosaurs didn’t lay equally giant eggs-but it’s very satisfying to think that we might finally understand why.” said Ruxton in a news release.

Scientists Discover Why Female Dinosaurs Laid Smaller EggsReuters

Scientists Discover Why Female Dinosaurs Laid Smaller Eggs      Reuters

Keeping this in mind, the researchers examined time duration of sauropod eggs from laying to hatching of eggs using previous data. These huge creatures incubated their eggs in underground nests and it took around 65 to 82 days for their eggs to hatch. Scientists believe that this long incubation time increased the predation risk along with some low level temperatures inside the nest, which may be the factors responsible in limiting the size of the eggs.

“We think that a long incubation period of sauropods is likely to have led to very high mortality through predation. We suggest that the females laid their eggs in small clutches, possibly in different nesting sites, as an adaptive strategy to mitigate the high predation risk associated with long time of exposure in the egg stage.” said Charles Deeming, one of the researchers.

Larger eggs would have larger hatchling size, which could have been an advantage; but the benefits may also increased risk of egg predation. But female dinosaurs having laid their eggs in different nesting sites and in small clutches, had better opportunity of protecting their offspring from predation.

The findings are published in the summer 2014 issue of the Paleontological Society’s journal, Paleobiology.

Article By:

New specimen of Archaeopteryx reveals previously unknown features of the plumage

Paleontologists of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich are currently studying a new specimen of Archaeopteryx, which reveals previously unknown features of the plumage. The initial findings shed light on the original function of feathers and their recruitment for flight.

A century and a half after its discovery and a mere 150 million years or so since it took to the air, Archaeopteryx still has surprises in store: The eleventh specimen of the iconic “basal bird” so far discovered turns out to have the best preserved plumage of all, permitting detailed comparisons to be made with other feathered dinosaurs. The fossil is being subjected to a thorough examination by a team led by Dr. Oliver Rauhut, a paleontologist in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at LMU Munich, who is also affiliated with the Bavarian State Collection for Paleontology and Geology in Munich. The first results of their analysis of the plumage are reported in the latest issue of Nature. The new data make a significant contribution to the ongoing debate over the evolution of feathers and its relationship to avian flight. They also imply that the links between feather development and the origin of flight are probably much more complex than has been assumed up to now.

The new (eleventh) specimen of Archaeopteryx. Credit: H. Tischlinger

The new (eleventh) specimen of Archaeopteryx.
Credit: H. Tischlinger

“For the first time, it has become possible to examine the detailed structure of the feathers on the body, the tail and, above all, on the legs,” says Oliver Rauhut. In the case of this new specimen, the feathers are, for the most part, preserved as impressions in the rock matrix. “Comparisons with other feathered predatory dinosaurs indicate that the plumage in the different regions of the body varied widely between these species. That suggests that primordial feathers did not evolve in connection with flight-related roles, but originated in other functional contexts,” says Dr. Christian Foth of LMU and the Bavarian State Collection for Paleontology and Geology in Munich, first author on the new paper.

To keep warm and to catch the eye

Predatory dinosaurs (theropods) with body plumage are now known to predate Archaeopteryx, and their feathers probably provided thermal insulation. Advanced species of predatory dinosaurs and primitive birds with feathered forelimbs may have used them as balance organs when running, like ostriches do today. Moreover, feathers could have served useful functions in brooding, camouflage and display. Indeed, the feathers on the tail, wings and hind-limbs most probably fulfilled functions in display, although it is very likely that Archaeopteryx was also capable of flight. “Interestingly, the lateral feathers in the tail of Archaeopteryx had an aerodynamic form, and most probably played an important role in its aerial abilities,” says Foth.

On the basis of their investigation of the plumage of the new fossil, the researchers have been able to clarify the taxonomical relationship between Archaeopteryx and other species of feathered dinosaur. Here, the diversity in form and distribution of the feather tracts is particularly striking. For instance, among dinosaurs that had feathers on their legs, many had long feathers extending to the toes, while others had shorter down-like plumage. “If feathers had evolved originally for flight, functional constraints should have restricted their range of variation. And in primitive birds we do see less variation in wing feathers than in those on the hind-limbs or the tail,” explains Foth.

These observations imply that feathers acquired their aerodynamic functions secondarily: Once feathers had been invented, they could be co-opted for flight. “It is even possible that the ability to fly evolved more than once within the theropods,” says Rauhut. “Since the feathers were already present, different groups of predatory dinosaurs and their descendants, the birds, could have exploited these structures in different ways.” The new results also contradict the theory that powered avian flight evolved from earlier four-winged species that were able to glide.

Archaeopteryx represents a transitional form between reptiles and birds and is the best-known, and possibly the earliest, bird fossil. It proves that modern birds are directly descended from predatory dinosaurs, and are themselves essentially modern-day dinosaurs. The many new fossil species of feathered dinosaurs discovered in China in recent years have made it possible to place Archaeopteryx within a larger evolutionary context. However, when feathers first appeared and how often flight evolved are matters that are still under debate.

The eleventh known specimen of Archaeopteryx is still in private hands. Like all other examples of the genus, it was found in the Altmühl valley in Bavaria, which in Late Jurassic times lay in the northern tropics, and at the bottom of a shallow sea, as all Archaeopteryx fossils found so far have been recovered from limestone deposits.